Drawing for BREAKIN' WIND

USPTO serial 76377318

BREAKIN' WIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREAKIN' WIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Kline

14910 BONNER COURTMORGAN HILL, CA 95037-5925UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025sportswear, namely tee shirts and pantsACTIVE—
035retail store services featuring sportswear; and direct marketing advertising for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance