USPTO serial 76377363
TASTY TRIANGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TASTY TRIANGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHERINE ROSEMAN SMITH
CATHERINE ROSEMAN SMITH KLAUBER & JACKSON411 HACKENSACK AVEHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen appetizers and hors d'oeuvres consisting of vegetables and/or meat wrapped in a flour dough crispy shell | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |