Drawing for ATKINS BENHAM

USPTO serial 76377406

ATKINS BENHAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATKINS BENHAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry J. Dunlap II

JERRY J DUNLAP II ATTORNEY AT LAWP O BOX 75404OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73147UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042engineering, architectural design and construction drafting servicesACTIVEJun 30, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance