Drawing for ZODEON

USPTO serial 76377703

ZODEON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZODEON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Lawson

JENNIFER K LAWSON ATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORTESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT, LLPHIGH ST TWR 125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the acquisition, manipulation, acceleration, and display of data used in the representation of depth, namely, software for use in geometric 3D rendering, software for use in stereoscopic display, software for use in autostereoscopic display, and software for use in the preparation of 3D and/or animated imagery for print or electronic display; electronic display units, namely CRTs, LCDs, LEDs, and electronically-addressable display media, namely, electronic paper, blank magnetic tape, blank diskettes, blank CDs, and blank DVDs; micro-optic equipment, namely, barrier screens, lenticulars, reflective, refractive, and diffractive microoptical arrays, used alone and in combination for creating, capturing, displaying, and reproducing three-dimensional imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 14, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 14, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance