Drawing for ORANGE STRAWBERRY BANANA BLOWOUT

USPTO serial 76377829

ORANGE STRAWBERRY BANANA BLOWOUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3159278Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ORANGE STRAWBERRY BANANA BLOWOUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott E. Thompson

Scott E. Thompson Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1177 Avenue of the Americas41st FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036-2714

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yogurt-based beveragesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 20, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 28, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 11, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 27, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 30, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance