USPTO serial 76378132
ACCURACY EFFICIENCY CONVENIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCURACY EFFICIENCY CONVENIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karol A. Kepchar
KAROL A KEPCHAR AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD LLP1676 INTERNATIONAL DRPENTHOUSE STEMCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation services, namely, providing business data to manufacturers of architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) components; providing information about the goods and services of others pertaining to architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) components via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | providing information on building components utilized in construction projects and in buildings, facilities and plant maintenance and management via a global computer network; consultation services in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) field | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing government and regulatory information relating to the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) field via a global computer network; collecting, organizing, codifying and providing architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) information for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |