Drawing for INTERMEDIATE MESH

USPTO serial 76378373

INTERMEDIATE MESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERMEDIATE MESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elliot A. Salter, Esq.

ELLIOT A SALTER ESQ SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019fiberglass mesh used in the formulation of exterior building wall surfacesACTIVEJan 11, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 27, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 18, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance