Drawing for IMAGEN

USPTO serial 76378547

IMAGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Boshinski

THOMAS A BOSHINSKI THE MEAD CORPORATIONCOURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45463UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES PERFORMED FOR OTHERS RELATING TO SOFTWARE FOR THE DESIGN AND EXECUTION OF FORMING ARTICLES OF PACKAGING, CARTONS AND THE LIKE, AND/OR CARTON BLANKS; COMPUTER-BASED INDUSTRIAL DESIGN FOR OTHERS RELATING TO THE DESIGN, EXECUTION AND ASSEMBLY OF ARTICLES OF PACKAGING, CARTONS, AND/OR THEIR BLANKS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FOR OTHERS RELATED TO THE AFORESAID SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 11, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance