USPTO serial 76378587
BIOPIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOPIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Henscheid, Esq.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT SNELL & WILMER LLPONE AZ CTR400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Point of sale transaction tracking systems, comprised of magnetically-striped cards and smart cards used for financial transaction or identification purposes, readers for magnetically-striped cards and smart cards, computerized keyboards and touch-pads; security servers, namely, computer hardware and software for monitoring and managing the security of on-line financial transactions; point of sale payment systems, comprised of network routers, computers, printers, personal identification number devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for recognition and processing of personal identification numbers; computer hardware and software for reading, processing, storing, comparing and verifying fingerprint measurement data and using such fingerprint measurement data to facilitate electronic financial and identification transactions; magnetic striped cards, and smart cards, namely, encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to record and store monetary and financial transaction information and/or identification information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing and developing personal identification numbers and personal identification number devices, namely, magnetic striped cards and smart cards for others; development of databases featuring personal identification numbers assigned to third parties and databases of fingerprint measurement data and technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; electronic comparison and verification of fingerprint measurement data; computer system security services, namely, providing, distributing, managing and verifying personal identification numbers and fingerprint measurement data used in secured financial transactions and online security services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |