USPTO serial 76378609
ED WEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ED WEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER, PATTON, LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AT THE PRESCHOOL, PRIMARY, SECONDARY, COLLEGE AND ADULT EDUCATION LEVEL VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIAL IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; CONDUCTING ONLINE EXHIBITIONS AND DISPLAYS AND INTERACTIVE EXHIBITS IN THE FIELD OF PRESCHOOL, PRIMARY, SECONDARY, COLLEGE AND ADULT LEVEL MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, SOCIAL SCIENCE, LITERATURE, LITERACY, LANGUAGE, HISTORY, HUMANITIES, ART, MUSIC, HEALTH AND SPORTS EDUCATION; PROVIDING TELEVISION AND RADIO PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; SOUND AND VIDEOTAPE RECORDING PRODUCTION; MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION; MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE PRODUCTION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |