USPTO serial 76378942
Serial No. 76378942
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76378942?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92442 Issy Les Moulineaux, Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANA L. TANGREN
DANA L TANGREN WORKMAN, NYDEGGER & SEELEY1000 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic modules to provide telecommunication capabilities for exchanging data, sound, still or motion pictures and messages not ably for radiotelephone equipment; apparatus for transmitting, broadcasting and receiving data, sound, still or motion pictures and messages, namely wireless apparatus for transmitting, broadcasting and receiving data, sound still or motion pictures and messages, modems and electronic modules to provide telecommunication capabilities for manufacturers in the fields of mobile phone, mobile computing, machine to machine interfaces and automotive; telephone and radiotelephone installations, apparatus, transmitters and receivers and structural parts and fittings thereof, namely to provide wireless capabilities with the plug of electronic modules into telephones and mobile phones, mobile computers and machine to machine interfaces and with the opening of software platform enabling the embedding of the above mentioned applications; answering machines; modems; paging apparatus, namely radio pagers; telephone exchange apparatus, namely wireless telephone exchange, apparatus, or mobile, portable or fixed telephone exchange apparatus; paging or radiotelephone repeaters; antenna pylons for wireless telephones; satellites and antennas notably for broadcasting, transmitting and receiving data, sound, still or motion pictures and messages and structural parts and fittings thereof; computer terminals, namely audio-video terminals and multimedia terminals; local area network and structural parts and fittings thereof; integrated circuits; microprocessors; printed circuit boards; electrical accumulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |