USPTO serial 76379008
TRUE LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRUE LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laval (Quebec), CA
Laval (Quebec), CA
Laval (Quebec), CA
REYNOLDS FOOD PACKAGING CANADA INC.
QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by REYNOLDS FOOD PACKAGING CANADA INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRACEY D. BEIRIGER
TRACEY D BEIRIGER ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLCALCOA TECH CTR 100 TECHNICAL DRALCOA CENTER, PA 15069-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Containers for use in food service packaging for salads, take-out foods, bakery products and other consumable items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M & R Plastics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by M & R Plastics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by M & R Plastics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by REYNOLDS FOOD PACKAGING CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TRUE LOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |