USPTO serial 76379076
IMMUNOGENOMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2004
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IMMUNOGENOMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY B. CHAPMAN
GARY B. CHAPMAN GREENLEE, WINNER AND SULLIVAN, P.C.SUITE 2004875 PEARL EAST CIRCLEBOULDER, CO 80301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Smokies Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Genova Diagnostics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Genova Diagnostics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named IMMUNOGENOMIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Dec 16, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 27, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | โ |
| May 5, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Jul 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| May 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |