Drawing for THE NATIONAL EDUCATORS NETWORK FOR CRESTOR

USPTO serial 76379867

THE NATIONAL EDUCATORS NETWORK FOR CRESTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NATIONAL EDUCATORS NETWORK FOR CRESTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff,

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audiotapes, videotapes, films, CD's and DVD's in the field of treatment of cardiovascular diseases, and cardiovascular health, and for use in connection with educational and information services and the training of speakers in said fieldsACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely, books, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets, guides and posters relating to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, and cardiovascular health, and for use in connection with educational and information services and the training of speakers in said fieldsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the field of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular health; on-line educational services, namely, conducting prorams in the field of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular health; training educational speakers in the field of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular healthACTIVE—
044Providing information in the field of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular health; on-line information services in the field of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular healthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance