USPTO serial 76379899
FOOD POLICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2003
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOOD POLICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitzi T Gramling
Mitzi T Gramling Minnesota Public Radio480 Cedar StreetOffice of General CounselSaint Paul, MN 55101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Series of magazine articles featuring restaurant reviews | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREENSPRING MEDIA GROUP, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Monthly Publications Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Monthly Publications Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FOOD POLICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |