USPTO serial 76380268
FLEXNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEXNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7 TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Satellites; satellite communication apparatus and instruments, namely, transmitters, transceivers, antennae, satellite signaling devices, satellite instrument gauges, computer terminals and keyboards; satellite communication terminals; telephones; telex machines and facsimile machines; data processors and signal processors; computers; computer terminals and keyboards; computer monitors; computer printers; antennae | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications services, namely, provision of television transmission, telephone communications, radio transmission, facsimile transmission, and providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet; satellite communications services, namely provision of television transmission, telephone communications, radio transmission, facsimile transmission, and providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet via satellite, Ku-Band satellite services; electronic mail services; telecommunications services, namely, provision of facsimile transmission, and providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet via telephone or radio; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; telex transmission services and facsimile transmission services; leasing of telecommunications equipment; provision of telecommunications information | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |