Drawing for ESQUIRE

USPTO serial 76380296

ESQUIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESQUIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry S. Agdern

BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded video cassettes featuring music, pagers, cellular phones, wireless phones, compact discs and audio cassettes featuring musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 18, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 23, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 23, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance