Drawing for LET'S ROLL

USPTO serial 76380435

LET'S ROLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LET'S ROLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Kennedy

PAUL J KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded compact discs, audiotapes, digital audiotapes, and phonograph records, all featuring music; pre-recorded compact discs, audiotapes, and digital audiotapes featuring narration of booksACTIVE—
016Books, publications, and other printed materials, namely books, brochures, pamphlets, and posters, all related to the 9-11 tragedy, individuals and family members involved in and affected by the 9-11 tragedy, and fundraising for children affected by family traumaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 7, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance