USPTO serial 76380450
AIR CARESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIR CARESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Glassman
JEFFREY R GLASSMAN REIN EVANS & SESTANOVICH LLP16TH FL1925 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MASSAGE APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRO-MECHANICAL VIBRATORY SYSTEM COMPRISING A VIBRATOR AND CONTROLLER FOR USE WITH BEDDING AND COMMERCIAL, DOMESTIC AND VEHICULAR SEATING; ELECTRIC MASSAGE APPARATUS FOR AIRCRAFT SEATING; MATS, UPHOLSTERED PADS, CHAISE LOUNGES, MASSAGE TABLES AND CHAIRS, WITH ELECTRONIC VIBRATORY MASSAGE UNITS AND CONTROLS; ELECTRIC HAND-HELD MASSAGE DEVICE; HEATERS AND ELECTRIC MOTORS THAT ARE A COMPONENT PART OF MASSAGE APPARATUS; AIR MATTRESSES, AIR CHAIRS, AIR MASSAGERS, AIR SEAT TOPPERS WITH AND WITHOUT MASSAGE DEVICES, AIR MATS WITH AND WITHOUT MASSAGE DEVICES, AND SEATING CUSHIONS WITH AND WITHOUT MASSAGE DEVICES, ALL FOR THERAPEUTIC USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |