USPTO serial 76380500
LICENSE BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LICENSE BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER E. GEORGE
CHRISTOPHER E GEORGE FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LA SALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | LICENSING OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOUNDS, NAMELY, CHEMICAL ENTITIES, DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES, THE FOREGOING INCLUDING DATA AND REGULATORY SUBMISSIONS, USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE DELIVERY OF MEDICATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, MEDICATION IN THE FIELDS OF MIGRAINE, GASTROINTESTINAL, RESPIRATORY, ONCOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACEUTICALS, CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY; DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOUNDS, DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES; PATENT LICENSING OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |