Drawing for INDIGO DIVISION

USPTO serial 76381036

INDIGO DIVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIGO DIVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in printing, copiers and photography, namely, chemical formulations for developing latent electrostatic images, oil and dispersions for inks and toners, adhesion promoters, adhesion promoter indicator solutions, electrostatic charge directors, carbons for inks and toners, inks dispersants, ink density sensor calibrations solution; additives for toners to promote electrostatic charging and imaging oilsACTIVE—
002Printing inks and toners, ink and toner cartridges, color pigments for printing and imaging machines; developers for printing; customized printing inks; color pigmentsACTIVE—
007Printing presses and parts and fittings thereforACTIVE—
009Computer programs for managing and operating computer printers in the field of printing; photoreceptors; computer operated printers and parts therefor; copying machines and parts thereforeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance