Drawing for BOMBSHELL

USPTO serial 76381046

BOMBSHELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOMBSHELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and video products, namely, video game machines for use with televisions; video game cartridges; video game tape cassettes; pre-recorded video tapes featuring computer games and computer game characters; motion picture films featuring video games and video game characters; television game programs featuring computer games and computer game characters; television game monitor consoles; computer game analog controllers in the nature of a hand held device for accessing computer games; computer game joysticks; memory cards, computer game software; computer game discs; computer game programs; computer game cassettes, computer game tapes, computer game cartridges, computer software featuring computer games that can be downloaded through a global computer network; multimedia software recorded on a CD-ROM featuring computer games; computers; computer hardware and computer firmware for use in operating computer games; computer mouse padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance