Drawing for MICROFOG

USPTO serial 76381167

MICROFOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROFOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow, Esquire

MARK LEBOW, ESQUIRE YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Poles, pipes of metal for use in fire fighting, fire prevention and pulverulent pollution preventionACTIVE—
007Pulverizing machines, motors for machines and air blowing machines comprised of blowing turbines for use in fire fighting, fire prevention and pulverulent pollution preventionACTIVE—
009Fire hose nozzles; fire engines; fire fighting equipment, namely, machines used in neutralizing and preventing explosions; fire extinguishersACTIVE—
011Refrigerating appliances, namely, fire fighting appliances that produce coolness by evaporation; water distribution and sanitary apparatus and installations, namely, units for water distribution and intake, as well as in sanitation, for preventing and controlling fires and chemical accidents; humidifiers; showers for cooling places and people, highway areas, beaches, campsites, parks, parking lots, golf courses, sports stadium, expositions, trade fairs, funfairs, terraces of cafes or restaurants, industrial zones and other public placesACTIVE—
019Non-metallic poles for use in fire fighting, fire prevention and pulverulent pollution preventionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance