USPTO serial 76381218
SSP-100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SSP-100?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Allan Horning
RICHARD ALLAN HORNING TOMLINSON ZISKO LLP200 PAGE ML RDPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Stand alone modular multi-stream storage processor comprised of logic circuitry and a file system for controlling high bandwidth signals in and out of mass storage devices and managing, storing and retrieving signals used in multiple applications namely signal acquisition appliances, digital video recorders, digital home entertainment player/recorder appliances, video capture devices, DV video cuts-only editing appliances, stand alone video/audio players, signal sources, loop players and video on demand server appliances | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Support services for stand alone modular multi-stream storage processor comprised of logic circuitry and a file system for controlling high bandwidth signals in and out of mass storage devices and managing, storing and retrieving signals used in multiple applications namely real-time signal acquisition appliances, digital video recorders, digital home entertainment player/recorder appliances, video capture devices, DV video cuts-only editing appliances, stand alone video/audio players, signal sources, loop players and video on demand server appliances, namely, technical support services in the nature of optimizing, configuring, debugging, programming, productizing, integrating and troubleshooting for multi-stream general purpose storage system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |