USPTO serial 76381769
NORTHSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORTHSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bo-In Lin
13445 MANDOLI DRLOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022-1925UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power-operated lifts for servicing land vehicles, power-operated automotive service equipment, namely, low rise lifts, mid-rise lifts, full rise lifts, 2-post lifts, 4-post lifts and scissor lifts, hydraulic transmission jacks, floor jacks, aluminum racing jacks, air/hydraulic bottle jacks, and air lift jacks, stands for hydraulic jacks, air compressors, shop cranes, industrial machine press, self-evacuating oil drains, oil extractors, brake lathes, and tire changers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE EQUIPMENT
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE EQUIPMENT
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named NORTHSTAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |