USPTO serial 76381787
SPEECHLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 31, 2002
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPEECHLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Little Rock, AR
Little Rock, AR
Little Rock, AR
LITTLE ROCK, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Reilly
Paul J. Reilly Baker Botts LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza, 44th FloorNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic, electric, and digital transmission of data, images, signals, and messages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLTEL Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLTEL Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLTEL Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SPEECHLESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |