USPTO serial 76381827
S-DOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2944334Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with S-DOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SECURE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
WEST PALM BEACH, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Slavin
MICHAEL A SLAVIN MCHALE & SLAVIN, PA2855 PGA BLVDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SECURE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Securit-E-Doc Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Securit-E-Doc Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Securit-E-Doc Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named S-DOC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |