USPTO serial 76381878
SUPERSAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERSAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BARNET, HERTFORDSHIRE EN4 0BY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. W. BREINER
A W BREINER115 N HENRY STPOST OFFICE BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | R.F. bandpass filters for mobile telephones, I.F. filters for mobile telephones and base stations, dual filters for mobile telephones, duplexers for mobile telephones and satellite communications, R.F. filters for CPS and wireless technology devices, I.F. filters for T.V. receivers and T.V. transmission systems; resonators for remote gas, pressure, temperature and flow sensors; electronic signal processors for radar, missile guidance, I.F.F. identification, friend or foe; oscillators for mobile telephones and wireless technology devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of electronic circuits and components for others; analysis and testing services for electronic components, circuits and devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |