USPTO serial 76381962
WHERE IS JOE MERCHANT?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHERE IS JOE MERCHANT??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Rosenbloum
GREENBERG TRAURIG ROBERT A. ROSENBLOUM & JAMIE N. SHIPP3290 NORTHSIDE PKWY STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30327-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring data, image, sound and text about a fictional character; a series of DVDs featuring data, image, sound and text about a fictional character; computer games and video games containing data, image, sound and text about a fictional character; sunglasses; magnets; and mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; watches; and clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stationery, paper stationery portfolios, binders, notebooks, pens, pencils, pencil cases, a series of books and magazines featuring fictional stories and games, comic books, calendars, photographs, posters, address books, trading cards, decals, stickers, and travel books | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks; athletic bags; book bags; luggage; tote bags; beach bags; duffel bags; fanny packs; handbags; key cases; overnight bags; wallets; umbrellas; beach bags; and beach umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Framed and unframed mirrors, picture frames, novelty pillows, sleeping bags, and plastic key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Mugs, beverageware, paper cups, paper plates, pitchers, plastic water bottles sold empty, thermal insulated container for beverages, lunch boxes, ceramic figurines, portable coolers, and drink can coolers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, headwear and beachwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Ornamental novelty buttons, cloth patches for clothing, and hair ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toy action figures and accessories therefor; games, namely, board games, role-playing games; Christmas tree ornaments; toy airplanes; toy boats; roller skates; and fishing equipment, namely, fishing rods, fishing nets, fishing reels, fishing lures and fishing tackle boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing travel tours and travel guide services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a series of live theatre productions, fan club services, providing information about a motion picture and live theatre production via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Buffett, Jimmy
- Other trademarks owned by Buffett, Jimmy
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named WHERE IS JOE MERCHANT?
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |