Drawing for CARING

USPTO serial 76382136

CARING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald M. Cislo

DONALD M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toy cell phones, toy pagers, plush toys, dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, play figures and board gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 31, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance