USPTO serial 76382669
ZEN-BEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZEN-BEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs, computer game cartridges, computer game cassettes, computer game programs and computer game tapes | ACTIVE | May 30, 2005 |
| 028 | Toy action figures and accessories therefor, stuffed toy animals, plush toy animals, children's multiple activity toys, electric action toys, mechanical action toys and action skill games | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |