Drawing for ENVISTA

USPTO serial 76382744

ENVISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2883559Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 14, 2004
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENVISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

Louis K. Ebling Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC2900 Chemed Center255 East Fifth StreetCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[Section 1(a) ONLY] Database management software for use with geographically-referenced data and environmental data; compliance systems, namely, software for tracking and monitoring compliance with environmental regulations and requirements; [Sections 1(a) and 44(e)] Database management software for use with environmental data; compliance systems, namely, software for tracking and monitoring compliance with environmental regulations and requirements; Database management software for use with geographically-referenced dataSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 30, 1999
042Consulting services in the fields of managing non-business environmental data, compliance with environmental regulations and requirements, and managing non-business geographically-referenced data; providing advice in the field of environmental data collection; design and installation of software in the field of environmental data collectionSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 30, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 10, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2008CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 14, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance