USPTO serial 76382915
MAXIMUS INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXIMUS INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling, Esq.
PETER RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services for others in the fields of multilateral trade policy, international trade, World Trade Organization negotiations, and imports and exports, all excluding the design, installation and maintenance of information technology and computer systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |