USPTO serial 76383219
CELERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eden Prairie, MN
Eden Prairie, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie Nafziger, Esq.
ELIZABETH C BUCKINGHAM DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPSTE 1500 50 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio Cassette Recorders; Audio Tape Recorders; Camcorders; CD Players; Compact Disc Players; Digital Audio Tape Players; Digital Audio Tape Recorders; Digital Cameras; Digital Phones; Digital Video Disc Drives; Digital Video Recorders; DVD Machines; Electric Audio Playback Units with Lights and Speakers; Electronic Personal Organizer; Headphones; Home Theater Products, Namely, LCD and DLP; Personal Stereos; Radios; Radios Incorporating Clocks; Audio Receivers; Video Receivers; Remote Controls for Radios and Stereos; Stereo Amplifiers; Stereo Receivers; Stereo Tuners; Sub-Woofers; Television Sets; VCD Machines; Video Cameras; Video Cassette Recorders; Video Monitors; Video Screens; Video Tape Recorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |