USPTO serial 76383404
OPTOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario K2K 2E3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark N. Mutterperl
MARK N MUTTERPERL FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical and optoelectronic modules and subsystems, all encoded with software for use with fiber optic networks, namely to monitor the performance of optical networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |