USPTO serial 76383848
AUROS IN HOUSE BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUROS IN HOUSE BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Regina M. Corrigan
REGINA M CORRIGAN GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP1400, 700 - 2 ND ST SWCALGARY, AB T2P 4V5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE EITHER DEPLOYED FROM THE INTERNET OR IN THE FORM OF DISKETTES, CD-ROMS AND DVD'S USED TO CONNECT A CORPORATION OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY WITH ITS AFFILIATES OR OTHER RELATED ENTITIES, AND WITH THE BANKS USED BY THE CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATES OR OTHER RELATED ENTITIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRACKING, AGGREGATING, PROCESSING AND RECONCILING FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN REAL TIME IN A LOCATION INDEPENDENT MANNER ACROSS ALL CONNECTED BANKS IN RESPECT OF EACH OF THE RELATED ENTITIES, AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING BOTH INTERCOMPANY LENDING AND BANK LENDING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |