USPTO serial 76384143
EVA SCRIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVA SCRIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN P MICHAEL
MARTIN P MICHAEL SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALP O BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin care preparations, cleansers, skin soap, antibacterial soap, deodorant soap, moisturizers, facial toner, skin toner, facial masks, day cream, night cream, hand cream, anti-wrinkle cream, body lotion, bubble bath, body scrubs, bath oil, bath powder, bath salts, skin gels, shower gels, bath gels; exfoliators; eye care products, namely, eye cream, eye shadow, eye liner, eye gel, mascara; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair mask, hair spray, gel, exfoliator; nail care products, namely, nail care preparations, nail polish, cuticle cream, cuticle removing preparations, nail polish remover; perfume, cologne and toilet water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |