USPTO serial 76384288
SAPUTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SAPUTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St-Leonard, Quebec, CA
SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
MONTREAL, CA
LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
ST-LEONARD, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
ST-LEONARD, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
Jeffrey H. Brown Michael Best & Friedrich LLP444 W. Lake Street, Suite 3200Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products and by products, namely; milk, butter, cream, yogurt, cheese, sour cream, powdered milk, powdered butter milk; vegetable oil; peanut oil; liquid and edible solid fats; canned tomatoes; margarine; processed olives; alimentary pastes, namely, vegetable, meat, cheese and tomato paste | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ice cream, vinegar; ketchup; relish; croutons; bacon flavored croutons; coffee; flour, sauces, namely, meat sauces, pasta sauces, hot sauce, cheese sauce; spices; sugar; cookies; biscuits; crackers; pastries; flaky pastries; rusks; breads; bread sticks; pretzels; bread crumbs; melba toast; cakes; tarts; confectionery, namely; candies, mint, bubble gum, jelly beans and peanut brittle; table syrups, molasses, honey; cocoa; mustards; vegetable-based marinades; custard based and chocolate based fillings for cakes and pies] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SAPUTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 27, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |