USPTO serial 76384289
SAPUTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3329795Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2007
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAPUTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St-Leonard, Quebec, CA
SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
MONTREAL, CA
SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
MONTREAL, CA
LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
ST-LEONARD, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
ST-LEONARD, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
ST-LEONARD, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew W. Walch
Matthew W. Walch Latham & Watkins LLP330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800Chicago, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products and by products, namely; milk, butter, cream, yogurt, cheese, sour cream, powdered milk, powdered butter milk; vegetable oil, peanut oil; liquid and edible solid fats, soups; dehydrated soups, canned tomatoes, margarine, jams, marmalades; jellies; processed olives; canned fruits and vegetables, fruit bases for making yogurt; spreads, namely, meat-based, vegetable based and cheese-based; alimentary pastes, namely vegetable, meat, cheese and tomato pastes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO PRODUITS LAITIERS CANADA S.E.N.C. / SAPUTO DAIRY PRODUCTS CANADA G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LES FROMAGES SAPUTO S.E.N.C./SAPUTO CHEESE G.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SAPUTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |