Drawing for MANUFACTUREDHOMESTODAY.COM

USPTO serial 76384358

MANUFACTUREDHOMESTODAY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANUFACTUREDHOMESTODAY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Sprinkle

DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing online information in the field of homes, mobile, modular and manufactured homes featuring information regarding purchasing mobile, modular and manufactured homes; providing online information in the field of housing communities developments and land featuring information about selecting and purchasing housing communities and land; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of businesses concerned with the creation, distribution and circulation of publications relating to homes, mobile, modular and manufactured homes, housing communities, developments, land, real estate and buying and selling homes and in soliciting, designing, and creating advertisements and advertising copy for inclusion thereinACTIVE—
036Providing online information in the field of real estate, namely, the buying and selling homesACTIVE—
037Providing online information in the field of housing communities developments and landACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance