Drawing for PERFECT PERFORMANCE POLICY

USPTO serial 76384422

PERFECT PERFORMANCE POLICY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2744565Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2003
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PERFECT PERFORMANCE POLICY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Salai

STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, surgical suturing instruments, suture loaders for surgical instruments for suturing, titanium sleeves for securing sutures, and fixtures for reloading instruments for suturing; and medical videoscopic display systems, namely, a video projector and a video display screen sold therewithSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 5, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 29, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 17, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 17, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance