USPTO serial 76385008
DEF TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEF TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose, Esq.
BRAD D ROSE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Television broadcasting; subscription television broadcasting; television transmission services; cable television broadcasting; cable television transmission services; pay-per-view television transmission services; audio broadcasting; video broadcasting; broadcasting programs via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |