USPTO serial 76385014
DEF RADIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEF RADIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose, Esq.
BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; audio-visual recordings, namely, compact discs, tape cassettes, audio cassettes, audio tapes, audio discs, records, CD-ROMs, video tapes, video cassettes, video discs, DVDs, DATs, and laser discs, all featuring music; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, booklets, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets and newsletters, all in the field of music; electronic publications, namely, books, booklets, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets and newsletters, all in the field of music recorded on CD-ROMs, diskettes, floppy disks, video cassettes, and magnetic tapes; magnets; decorative magnets; refrigerator magnets; novelty magnets; mouse pads; compact disc cases; fitted cases for storage and transportation, namely, cases for compact discs, audio cassettes, video cassettes, CD-ROMs, home video games, home video game accessories, computers, computer accessories, cameras, camcorders and portable phones; computer carrying cases; wrist rests and supports for computer mouse users; wrist rests for computer products; computer keyboard wrist pads; eyewear; sunglasses; eyeglasses; eyeglass frames; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle cases; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle straps; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle chains; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle cleaning cloths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |