USPTO serial 76385153
B MAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B MAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ochi-gun, Ehime Pref.799-2294, JP
Ochi-gun, Ehime Pref.799-2294, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Auxiliary medical instruments and orthopedic apparatus and instruments, namely, crutches, hearing aids for deaf; hospital equipment, namely, invalid hoists; electric motor-driven type beds for medical purposes; portable bathing care equipment, namely, chairs and benches for bathing invalids; therapy apparatus and instruments, namely, therapeutic saunas; electric massage apparatus for home use | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Parts and fittings of ships and boats, namely, structural parts for boats and ships, electric fittings for boats and ships, namely horns for vehicles; electric vehicles for physically handicapped persons and old persons, namely, electric wheelchairs and their parts and fittings; electric tricycles and their parts and fittings; tricycles with auxiliary electric motor and their parts and fittings; wheelchairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Electrical installation, maintenance and repair services, namely, lighting fixture installations, computer installations, household electric apparatus and instrument installations, freezers and freezing equipment installations, fire alarm installations, air conditioning apparatus installations; telecommunication installation, maintenance and repair services, namely, telephone installations; repair and maintenance of ships and boats; repair and maintenance of lighting fixtures; repair and maintenance of electrical communication apparatus and instruments, namely, repair and maintenance of telephones; repair and maintenance of computers, repair and maintenance of household electric apparatus and instruments, repair and maintenance of freezers and freezing equipment, repair and maintenance of fire alarms, repair and maintenance of air conditioning apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication by computer terminal for ships; facsimile communication, namely, facsimile transmission; cellular telephone communications, namely, cellular telephone service; communication by satellite, namely, satellite communication services; communication by electronic mail, namely, electronic mail services; comprehensive data communications services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, other communication by computer terminals, namely, electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Uzushio Electric Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Uzushio Electric Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named B MAC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |