USPTO serial 76385445
PRO GRASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO GRASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Town of Mont-Royal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT H. FINN
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, PCSTE 250077 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1732Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Synthetic turf systems consisting of synthetic fibers and a particulate infill for the playing of soccer, American football, lacrosse, field hookey, golf and other athletic activities; synthetic surfacing consisting of synthetic fibers for the playing of soccer, American football, lacrosse, field hockey, golf and other athletic activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of synthetic turf systems consisting of synthetic fibers and a particulate infill for the playing of soccer, American football, lacrosse, field hockey, golf and other athletic activities; installation of synthetic surfacing consisting of synthetic fibers for the playing of soccer, American football, lacrosse, field hockey, golf and other athletic activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |