USPTO serial 76385736
I-POINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-POINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RANDALL B. BATEMAN
RANDALL B BATEMAN CUSTOMER NUMBER 27 4 BATEMAN IP LAW GROUP8 E BROADWAY STE 550PO BOX 1319SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Inhalation drug delivery device for delivering pharmaceutical products to the respiratory tract for the management of lung disease or delivered to the respiratory tract for systemic administration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |