USPTO serial 76386190
THOUGHT CAPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THOUGHT CAPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. FROHWEIN
ROBERT J FROHWEIN LAVA GROUP LAW BY SMITH & FROHWEIN LLCTWO RAVINA DR STE 790ATLANTA, GA 30346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for managing an on-line database for educational information relating to human potential and human resources development, specifically in the areas of inventiveness, creativity, idea generation and enhanced productivity | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS, PUBLIC SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS, LECTURES, CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN POTENTIAL AND RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, SPECIFICALLY IN THE AREAS OF INVENTIVENESS, CREATIVITY, IDEA GENERATION AND ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO HUMAN POTENTIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, SPECIFICALLY IN THE AREAS OF INVENTIVENESS, CREATIVITY, IDEA GENERATION AND ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |