USPTO serial 76386388
AROMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2003
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AROMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
72500 Chateau du Loir, FR
72500 Chateau du Loir, FR
72500 Chateau du Loir, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman, Esq.
ROD S BERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC, GAS-OPERATED, AND LASER WELDING MACHINES AND THEIR COMPONENTS; ELECTRIC, GAS-OPERATED, AND LASER WELDING MACHINES FOR THE MANUFACTURE, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF VEHICLES; ELECTRIC, GAS-OPERATED, AND LASER WELDING PLIER MACHINES; ELECTRIC, GAS-OPERATED, AND LASER WELDING PLIER MACHINES FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOBILE FIELD; ELECTRIC, GAS-OPERATED, AND LASER WELDING GUN MACHINES; ELECTRIC, GAS-OPERATED, AND LASER WELDING GUN MACHINES FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOBILE FIELD; ARMS AS PARTS FOR WELDING MACHINES; ELECTRICAL WELDING MACHINES; ELECTRICAL WELDING APPARATUS AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC ARC WELDING MACHINES, ELECTRIC WELDING MACHINES, GAS OPERATED WELDING MACHINES AND LASER WELDING MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | NON-ELECTRIC, HAND-HELD GUNS AND WELDING PLIERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL WELDING PROGRAMMABLE CONTROLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |