USPTO serial 76386448
MINTRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINTRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LuChou, Taipei Hsien, TW
LuChou, Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Fichter
RICHARD E FICHTER BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CHARGE COUPLE DEVICE CAMERAS (CCD CAMERAS); VIDEO MONITORS; VIDEO MONITOR WALL MOUNTING BRACKETS SOLD AS A UNIT WITH VIDEO MONITORS; OPTICAL LENS; CAMERAS; ELECTRONIC CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEM, NAMELY CAMERAS, MONITORS, VIDEO SWITCHERS, VIDEO TIMERS, QUADS, VIDEO DISTRIBUTORS, VIDEO AMPLIFIERS, VIDEO MOTION DETECTORS, CAMERA WALL MOUNTING BRACKETS, PAN UNITS, PAN UNIT CONTROLS, CAMERA HOUSING AND LENS; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, NAMELY VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO CABLES, CAPTURE CARDS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, MODEMS, BLANK VCDS, BLANK DVDS, BURGLAR ALARMS, REED RELAYS, INFRA-RED SENSORS, INFRA-RED PROJECTORS, ALARM SENSORS, DIGITAL RECORDERS AND VIDEO RECORDERS; IMAGE PROCESSION SYSTEM, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, DIGITAL STILL CAMERAS, SCANNERS, CAPTURE CARDS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR VIDEO IMAGE PROCESSING, COLOR PRINTERS AND PLOTTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |