USPTO serial 76386647
CEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Employment counseling and recruiting; fund raising and grant-generating to promote education and training of others in the field of construction; fund raising and grant-generating to provide grants to organizations that provide education and training to others in the field of construction; providing grants to organizations that provide education and training to others in the field of construction; providing educational and training scholarships; and charitable fund raising services; education and training in the field of construction, construction management and construction safety; development and dissemination of educational and training materials in the field of construction, construction management and construction safety; providing recognition and incentives by way of awards and on-line acknowledgment to demonstrate excellence in the field of construction education and training; entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of construction; and entertainment in the nature of organizing and conducting auctions and foot races to raise money for grants, scholarships and promoting education and training of others in the field of construction; association services, namely, promoting the construction industry and promoting education and training in the field of construction; providing an on-line discussion forum in the field of education and training in the field of construction; providing non-downloadable educational and training updates in the field of construction, via the Internet; and charitable services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |